Neutrality - Revision history

Lisa at 03:05, 1 October 2016

2016-10-01T03:05:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 30 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Neutrality]] is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological), which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In colloquial use "neutral" can be synonymous with "unbiased." However, bias is a favoritism for some side, distinct of the tendency to act on that favoritism.		[[Neutrality]] is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological), which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In colloquial use "neutral" can be synonymous with "unbiased." However, bias is a favoritism for some side, distinct of the tendency to act on that favoritism.

	Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, [[Doublethink]], equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of ~~incommensurability~~). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.		Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, [[Doublethink]], equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of issues that are impossible to measure). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.
	In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome.~~[6]~~ For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy) Neutrality]</ref>
			In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome. For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy) Neutrality]</ref>

	==Neutral Association==		==Neutral Association==

Lisa: /* Neutral Association */

2016-10-01T03:03:00Z

Neutral Association

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 30 September 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	==Neutral Association==		==Neutral Association==
	The [[Controller]]s have zero power over you (one's thoughts and emotional state) when you are outside of their frequency reach by maintaining neutral balance or the [[Observer Point]]. If you stay out of mental and emotional polarity (inferior and superior thought forms) it is very hard for them to manipulate or control you. The Controllers have no access to control Now Moment Consciousness and do not understand the self-organization of God Force in Action as the [[Compassionate Witness]]. When you are capable to maintain and then embody energetic balance (through observer with no attachment to outcome) God Forces can access your being and bring resolution, reconciliation and peace to the most despairing of circumstances. Remember Fear closes the door to God Force while holding the inner Balance (Peace and Love) opens it. <ref>[http://www.energeticsynthesis.com/index.php/resource-tools/news-shift-timelines/1614-letting-go-of-all-you-know September 2011 Newsletter] </ref>		The [[Controller]]s have zero power over you (one's thoughts and emotional state) when you are outside of their frequency reach by maintaining neutral balance or the [[Observer Point]]. If you stay out of mental and emotional polarity (inferior and superior thought forms) it is very hard for them to manipulate or control you. The Controllers have no access to control Now Moment Consciousness and do not understand the self-organization of God Force in Action as the [[Compassionate Witness]]. When you are capable to maintain and then embody energetic balance (through observer with no attachment to outcome) God Forces can access your being and bring resolution, reconciliation and peace to the most despairing of circumstances. Remember Fear closes the door to God Force while holding the inner Balance (Peace and Love) opens it. <ref>[http://www.energeticsynthesis.com/index.php/resource-tools/news-shift-timelines/1614-letting-go-of-all-you-know September 2011 Newsletter] </ref>



	==References==		==References==

Lisa at 03:02, 1 October 2016

2016-10-01T03:02:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 30 September 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, [[Doublethink]], equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of incommensurability). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.		Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, [[Doublethink]], equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of incommensurability). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.
	In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome.[6] For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy) Neutrality]</ref>		In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome.[6] For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy) Neutrality]</ref>

			==Neutral Association==
			The [[Controller]]s have zero power over you (one's thoughts and emotional state) when you are outside of their frequency reach by maintaining neutral balance or the [[Observer Point]]. If you stay out of mental and emotional polarity (inferior and superior thought forms) it is very hard for them to manipulate or control you. The Controllers have no access to control Now Moment Consciousness and do not understand the self-organization of God Force in Action as the [[Compassionate Witness]]. When you are capable to maintain and then embody energetic balance (through observer with no attachment to outcome) God Forces can access your being and bring resolution, reconciliation and peace to the most despairing of circumstances. Remember Fear closes the door to God Force while holding the inner Balance (Peace and Love) opens it. <ref>[http://www.energeticsynthesis.com/index.php/resource-tools/news-shift-timelines/1614-letting-go-of-all-you-know September 2011 Newsletter] </ref>



	==References==		==References==

Lisa at 03:00, 1 October 2016

2016-10-01T03:00:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 30 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Neutrality]] is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological), which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In colloquial use "neutral" can be synonymous with "unbiased." However, bias is a favoritism for some side, distinct of the tendency to act on that favoritism.		[[Neutrality]] is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological), which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In colloquial use "neutral" can be synonymous with "unbiased." However, bias is a favoritism for some side, distinct of the tendency to act on that favoritism.

	Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, ~~doublethink~~, equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of incommensurability). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.		Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, [[Doublethink]], equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of incommensurability). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.
	In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome.[6] For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy) Neutrality]</ref>		In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome.[6] For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy) Neutrality]</ref>

Lisa: Created page with "Neutrality is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological), which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In c..."

2016-10-01T02:59:24Z

Created page with "Neutrality is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological), which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In c..."

New page

[[Neutrality]] is the tendency not to side in a conflict (physical or ideological), which may not suggest neutral parties do not have a side or are not a side themselves. In colloquial use "neutral" can be synonymous with "unbiased." However, bias is a favoritism for some side, distinct of the tendency to act on that favoritism.

Neutrality is distinct (though not exclusive) from apathy, ignorance, indifference, doublethink, equality, agreement, and objectivity. Objectivity suggests siding with the more reasonable position (except journalistic objectivity), where reasonableness is judged by some common basis between the sides, such as logic (thereby avoiding the problem of incommensurability). Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. Advocating neutrality is non-neutral.
In moderation/mediation neutrality is often expected to make judgments or facilitate dialog independent of any bias, putting emphasis on the process rather than the outcome.[6] For example, a neutral-party is seen as a party with no (or a fully disclosed) conflict of interest in a conflict, and is expected to operate as-if it has no bias. Neutral Parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy) Neutrality]</ref>

==References==

<references/>

==See Also==

[[Virtues]]

[[Spirits of Christ]]

[[Krystal Star]]

[[Category: Ascension]][[Category:Newsletter]]